a vast inflow of resources.
begin with James Renouf telling me to get on SnapChat, which sounds right, which sounds like a version of live social media. this has me looking at Android Emulators, so i don't need to buy a phone, concluding in the end that this one (google: AMIDuOS Review )is the best, and it sure sounds intriguing, though i'm also afraid.
a tweet. i kind of don't like it - i guess i'm jealous -, but it talks about how to sell a company, so i sure am interested. first, you need to be an llc or corporation.
how do i register an llc in ...?
very good page to know about
what kind of corporation should i create?
excellent
from the author:
that is not all.
pivoting, how to kill it on twitter
strangely, the first awesome informative link was on the second google page and half way down
Showing posts with label personal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label personal. Show all posts
Saturday, February 6, 2016
Friday, February 5, 2016
shows
while i'm on the topic of Blogger, why can't i edit posts in the blog? are you telling me that can't be set up?! by the way you can edit the sidebar in the blog, but not the posts. that's kind of backwards, if anything.
frankly, i don't mind going to the editor to edit posts that much. what is really getting me is i can't edit LABELS from the blog. without that i'm really limited when it comes to creating shows.
frankly, i don't mind going to the editor to edit posts that much. what is really getting me is i can't edit LABELS from the blog. without that i'm really limited when it comes to creating shows.
evolution
the thing i can't do effectively on Blogger is create a show.
the function of posts is so essential, little pieces of content that can be assembled into shows, or could be ... one way or another you need to do it ... but in Blogger you can't move or copy things ... posts ... from one place to another
you can create pages using labels ... different pages out of one blog ... but it's quite difficult. well, it's still the starting place.
it's time to move my labels into the side bar
surging
the thing is i'm going through a folder of old screenshots, looking for an item that might be in there, and i'm finding all these stock charts i saved when i was using this folder, a few months back. here and there one is catching my eye. who knows when i'll look at these again, so i can do something positive by moving selected charts into this live section of my cloud.
i wondered if i had missed the boat on this one.
but, no, it's still down and behaving nicely.
it's making bottoms, wide shallow ones, and at higher levels than it did before (when the bottom was more spiky). this pattern is called a surge. now, just because it's surging doesn't mean it won't go down, next, and if it does it will tend to stay down for a while. what the surge means is it's got some substance to it. it could make a splash some time. remember we are only buying a little. if it goes down we buy a little more. it would be nice to know exactly when it's ready to splash, and i'm not saying it would be impossible to figure that out ... well, it might be. The pattern right now is distinctive, but i give it only a 50% chance of producing an immediate splash. To put it another way, it has a 30% chance of making a splash, a 30% chance of going sideways, and a 30% chance of going down. That looks like a non prediction but a) not every stock has a thirty percent chance of making a splash within days, and then, b) not every stock has a 30% chance of going down, and, too, i'm not talking about down a little. remember how NETE went down 80% on me? this is the nature of the prediction, and that's why i'm telling you to be very careful and only invest delicate amounts. read the previous post.
a splash. i predict a splash ... to 8. then a dip, back to 3. it's an insane thought. long term is the way to make real money ... but i feel so impatient!
what about the fundamentals?
they're well established in a certain line of business. it's actually a fairly large company. they're consistently losing a little money - this over the last several years. book value is decent. what's their line of business? well, it's kind of interesting and it does sound quite professional ... and, well, glamorous. fundamentals kind of support the idea that it could make a splash ... and seem to suggest it's not too risk and that it's good for the long term.
that's a very energetic pattern ... the last 20 bars. of course, the last bar is nascent ...
i really want to thank FinViz for these charts. they're terrific.
i wondered if i had missed the boat on this one.
but, no, it's still down and behaving nicely.
it's making bottoms, wide shallow ones, and at higher levels than it did before (when the bottom was more spiky). this pattern is called a surge. now, just because it's surging doesn't mean it won't go down, next, and if it does it will tend to stay down for a while. what the surge means is it's got some substance to it. it could make a splash some time. remember we are only buying a little. if it goes down we buy a little more. it would be nice to know exactly when it's ready to splash, and i'm not saying it would be impossible to figure that out ... well, it might be. The pattern right now is distinctive, but i give it only a 50% chance of producing an immediate splash. To put it another way, it has a 30% chance of making a splash, a 30% chance of going sideways, and a 30% chance of going down. That looks like a non prediction but a) not every stock has a thirty percent chance of making a splash within days, and then, b) not every stock has a 30% chance of going down, and, too, i'm not talking about down a little. remember how NETE went down 80% on me? this is the nature of the prediction, and that's why i'm telling you to be very careful and only invest delicate amounts. read the previous post.
a splash. i predict a splash ... to 8. then a dip, back to 3. it's an insane thought. long term is the way to make real money ... but i feel so impatient!
what about the fundamentals?
they're well established in a certain line of business. it's actually a fairly large company. they're consistently losing a little money - this over the last several years. book value is decent. what's their line of business? well, it's kind of interesting and it does sound quite professional ... and, well, glamorous. fundamentals kind of support the idea that it could make a splash ... and seem to suggest it's not too risk and that it's good for the long term.
that's a very energetic pattern ... the last 20 bars. of course, the last bar is nascent ...
i really want to thank FinViz for these charts. they're terrific.
splash
I already own a few hundred shares. I think I bought them at $1 and now they're down 80%.
I bought because of the chart. I remember I really liked it. I still really like it but I'm thinking more carefully about why.
Basically I see this going to 10 again ... some time this year, maybe? next year, maybe? ... and then back to zero again.
I checked the fundamentals.
I actually like this company. What they do sounds important, and it sounds like they're good at it. They're selling a lot more than they were three years ago - still a tiny business, but up significantly. They're losing money at a fair clip, though less of a clip than three years ago, so there's a positive twist to that as well.
I stand by my prediction. These guys don't have enough momentum to take over the world, and when that becomes obvious the market will abandon their stock, and it'll go back to zero for a long time, but the market is right to support them now. They're doing good work. They are also able to make their case to the market. That's what pushed the stock up to so much higher levels for a considerable period - all of 2013, I mean, anyway. And it certainly jumped up there. That's called a splash. Somehow they made one. My gut tells me they're good for another one in this episode.
It's certainly tempting to study this chart closely. If we could just catch two splashes of the sort shown here, in a year, we could do very well. And the chart from 2009 to 2012 is the exact kind of chart we would expect to see before a splash. What type of chart is that? Hmm. Over a four year period, small splashes - but a splash is a splash - a splash is instantaneous - separated by wide, shallow troughs. More precisely what we can see is a set of splashes, a wide shallow trough, another set of splashes, and another trough forming ... and with a surging quality to it. Looking for that kind of chart we could catch a splash.
Will every such chart produce a splash? Will every such chart produce a splash this big? Who know? Not me. If you're starting out, try to catch splashes with $100 investments. If you catch one right away you'll then have a couple of thousand dollars in free investment money (though you'll have to pay taxes on your gain, don't forget). And if one of those investments after another is a bust, you're still only out a few hundred dollars. That's the risk and reward on this system.
I bought because of the chart. I remember I really liked it. I still really like it but I'm thinking more carefully about why.
Basically I see this going to 10 again ... some time this year, maybe? next year, maybe? ... and then back to zero again.
I checked the fundamentals.
I actually like this company. What they do sounds important, and it sounds like they're good at it. They're selling a lot more than they were three years ago - still a tiny business, but up significantly. They're losing money at a fair clip, though less of a clip than three years ago, so there's a positive twist to that as well.
I stand by my prediction. These guys don't have enough momentum to take over the world, and when that becomes obvious the market will abandon their stock, and it'll go back to zero for a long time, but the market is right to support them now. They're doing good work. They are also able to make their case to the market. That's what pushed the stock up to so much higher levels for a considerable period - all of 2013, I mean, anyway. And it certainly jumped up there. That's called a splash. Somehow they made one. My gut tells me they're good for another one in this episode.
It's certainly tempting to study this chart closely. If we could just catch two splashes of the sort shown here, in a year, we could do very well. And the chart from 2009 to 2012 is the exact kind of chart we would expect to see before a splash. What type of chart is that? Hmm. Over a four year period, small splashes - but a splash is a splash - a splash is instantaneous - separated by wide, shallow troughs. More precisely what we can see is a set of splashes, a wide shallow trough, another set of splashes, and another trough forming ... and with a surging quality to it. Looking for that kind of chart we could catch a splash.
Will every such chart produce a splash? Will every such chart produce a splash this big? Who know? Not me. If you're starting out, try to catch splashes with $100 investments. If you catch one right away you'll then have a couple of thousand dollars in free investment money (though you'll have to pay taxes on your gain, don't forget). And if one of those investments after another is a bust, you're still only out a few hundred dollars. That's the risk and reward on this system.
Thursday, February 4, 2016
what to do (old)
What to do, what to do?
Trying to document the news, which is the newspaper. Managed one page.
Part of the problem is this is private, parts of it, just my memories. But it should be going to the cloud. Near Cloud. My Cloud. What is the Cloud?
Trying to document the news, which is the newspaper. Managed one page.
Part of the problem is this is private, parts of it, just my memories. But it should be going to the cloud. Near Cloud. My Cloud. What is the Cloud?
journey
<div id="home" style="position:absolute;left:150px;top:100px;width:500px;height:100px;font-size:100px">
<div id="father" style="position:absolute;left:0%;top0%;width:100%;height:100%;font-size:100%;background-color:purple">
<a href="javascript:start()" style="color:lightgrey">click here</a></div></div><div style="display:none">1,19,2016,14,55</div>
<script>
function clean_home() {
var home = document.getElementById("home")
if (home.hasChildren()) {home.removeFirstChild()}}
function show_mother(
var motherwidth = 1
var fatherwidth = 100 / 13.86 +
function locate_an_event_on_a_bar(percent,
function add_universe() {
var centermoment = document.getElementById("centermoment").innerHTML.split(",")
var onebillion = 1000000000
var momentzero = 50 * onebillion
var momentzerooftheuniverse = momentzero - 13.8 * onebillion
var width = percent_distance_between_two_moments(seventy_as_percent(
var age_of_the_universe_in_billions_of_years = 13.84
var one_year_equals =
</script>
<div id="father" style="position:absolute;left:0%;top0%;width:100%;height:100%;font-size:100%;background-color:purple">
<a href="javascript:start()" style="color:lightgrey">click here</a></div></div><div style="display:none">1,19,2016,14,55</div>
<script>
function clean_home() {
var home = document.getElementById("home")
if (home.hasChildren()) {home.removeFirstChild()}}
function show_mother(
var motherwidth = 1
var fatherwidth = 100 / 13.86 +
function locate_an_event_on_a_bar(percent,
function add_universe() {
var centermoment = document.getElementById("centermoment").innerHTML.split(",")
var onebillion = 1000000000
var momentzero = 50 * onebillion
var momentzerooftheuniverse = momentzero - 13.8 * onebillion
var width = percent_distance_between_two_moments(seventy_as_percent(
var age_of_the_universe_in_billions_of_years = 13.84
var one_year_equals =
</script>
paradise
my ankles were actually freezing
shopping on line for mobile mechanics. god how weird.
it's starting to get sunny, though. life in paradise.
shopping on line for mobile mechanics. god how weird.
it's starting to get sunny, though. life in paradise.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)